Peter Connelly
- Baby P
March 1, 2006 -
August 2, 2007
Today, January 27,
2009 I learned that this little Angels
name is Peter Connelly.
Born in London, England
and at this time, December 29, 2008 known only as "Baby P.", a child who
would die after more than 60 visits from the same social services who failed
to protect Victoria Climbie. Baby P. was known to family as "Smiley". This
child managed to smile even though at home he suffered unimaginable horror
at the hands of those trusted with his life. They betrayed that trust and
took his life from him.
.
Born on March 1,
2006, Baby P. was able to say his first words, among those words, was the
word "dad" which is what he called his mothers boyfriend who she moved
in shortly after her marriage to Smiley's biological father ended. Just
four short months after his parents split up, his mother was already living
with another man and his life of torture had begun. On December 11, Baby
P. was taken to the hospital and admitted with a two inch bruise on his
forehead as well as bruises on his chest and shoulder.
.
The picture above
shows Peter with several bruises on his face.
A pattern that I
have seen many many times while researching child abuse cases, this seems
to be a case of a mother who wanted to keep her boyfriend happy and would
allow him to do anything he wanted to in order to achieve that. I wish
that I could shake some sense into these women and tell them that no man
is worth the life of their children.
.
..
While his mother
was on the computer, her boyfriend put Smiley through some of the most
horrific things I have ever heard of putting a child through. Smiley was
used as a punching bag, his finger nails were pinched with pliers until
they fell off. He was wrapped in so many layers of clothing that he began
to sweat and had trouble breathing. He was treated like a dog so much that
when the boyfriend would go towards him, he would put his head to the floor
like an abused dog.
When the home was
searched, police found dog and human feces on the floor as well as rat
holes in the walls. Pornography was found and along with that the bodies
of mice, baby chicks and a dismembered rabbit. Smiley's bed and bedroom
walls had stains of his own blood on them. He weighed less than a child
five months younger than he was. Smiley had been hitting his own head on
the walls and the floor.
Doctors and social
workers had seen the injuries and the bruises which should have indicated
that that Smiley was being abused. His mother was arrested while under
suspicion of abuse and was let go both times due to supposed lack of evidence.
How can there be a lack of evidence when a child has that many injuries?
None of these people were aware that the mother had moved in a man who
was obsessed with causing pain to others. That is NO excuse though, this
child was suffering and they had an obligation to help him. They failed
another child!
WARNING...Graphic
in nature! Please do not click on the link if you are easily triggered.
Chart
of Smiley's injuries
The man Smiley called
dad wore combat gear, collected Nazi memorabilia, was obsessed with knives
and was rarely seen without his Rottweiler dog. Also in the home he kept
martial arts weapons and a crossbow. Relatives told stories of his torture
and killing of small animals. Smiley's "dad" had been prosecuted for the
torture of animals and also was investigated for torturing his own grandmother
in an attempt to get her to change her will to benefit him. Unfortunately,
the grandmother died of pneumonia before this could happen. This 32 year
old, illiterate man moved into Smiley's mothers home in North London and
within weeks, began torturing the poor little baby boy.
Resources which were
given to this mother included social services paying for a woman named
Ann Walker who was a registered child minder, to take care of Smiley four
days a week. Ann said this:
"He came to
me always very dirty and smelly. You could see he was a child who was neglected.
He had the most sad eyes. You knew something was wrong."
Doctors who saw Smiley
said that the wounds they were seeing were "very suggestive of on-accidental
injury" and they called social services. Smiley's mother and grandmother
were arrested on suspicion of abuse. On December 22, Smiley was placed
on Haringey's child protection register. Of course this would prove to
be of no help to Smiley. Smiley was returned to his mother on January 26,
2007. This was done AGAINST police advice. By March the case worker assigned
to Smiley's case noticed a red spot on his face and was told by his mother
than he had hit his head on the side of a table and that he bruised easily.
The claim was checked
out by doctors who didn't believe the mothers story. A report made stating
this some how managed to NOT make it to the police or to the social workers
until after Smiley's death on August 3. In April, after Smiley had turned
one, he was taken to the hospital with a large swelling and bruises on
his head. Even though social services was informed of this, Smiley was
once again returned to his mother with Miss Ward stating that she had no
concerns.
Smiley's mother missed
scheduled appointments with Paulette Thomas who was her health visitor
and was told in June to take Smiley to the hospital for a protection order
check up. At that time, doctors found 12 places on his body with scratches
and bruising with what they called a grip mark on his leg. Once again,
his mother was arrested on suspicion of abuse. SHOCKINGLY, smiley was once
again sent home with his mother. She, once again, failed to take Smiley
to scheduled check ups.
On two occasions
police asked for cross agency meetings, in the week before Smiley would
die. Both times Haringey's lawyers claimed there was not enough information
to begin what is are known as care proceedings.
In July a man moved
into the home as a lodger, his name was Jason Own. He also had three children
and a 15 year old girlfriend. Owen says that Smiley's mother and stepfather
put chocolate and nappy cream on his face and hands to hide his injuries
from the social worker. The social worker and Sabah Al-Zayyat, the pediatrician
missed injuries on the child.
.
On July 29, Smiley
spent what would be his last visit with his biological father. The father
said that Smiley's head had been shaved and that his hand had bandages
on it to cover a missing fingernail. On July 30 when he brought Smiley
back to his mother he says this happened:
"As she walked
away he screamed 'daddy, daddy, daddy', so much so that she brought him
back so I
could say goodbye."
On his last day alive,
Smiley was failed by even the police who had tried to protect him. On August
2, the police told his mother that no further action would be taken against
her due to the suspicions of her abusing him. That day, Smiley would receive
one final blow that would knock out one of his teeth and cause him
to stop breathing. The tooth would be found later, in his stomach.
Found dead in his
cot the next morning, the police went to the North Middlesex Hospital and
had the nerve to be shocked that his mother showed no emotion. Smiley's
mother was arrested as well as her boyfriend. Police went to her house
to do a search and found that the mother who had claimed to be a "damned
good mum", was nothing of the sort. Having ben raised by a drug addicted
mother, she knew all about social workers and how to manipulate them. One
of the senior officers said"
"She knew how
to play the system, how to tell social workers what they wanted to hear,
and
how to press
the right buttons to get what she wanted, whether it was a new council
house
or child care"
Having not known
her biological father until adulthood, she was told as a teenager that
she would have to choose between going into care or being sent to a boarding
school. Choosing boarding school, she ended up leaving there at the age
of 15 and worked as a barmaid and a hairdresser. She married a man twice
her age in 2003. Their relationship went bad shortly after Smiley was born,
in 2006.
On November 13, 2008,
Smiley's mother gave birth to another child, while in prison. She is fighting
for visitation rights with that child. While in prison she is said to have
discussed the case with an anonymous source who claims she said:
"She showed
no remorse and showed off about how she watched porn while her boyfriend
abused the
child. She described her bloke as 'a bit of a nutter' as if it was all
quite funny.
She said she
loved him so would just let him get on with whatever he wanted to
do."
Surprisingly, a jury
was unable to make a decision as for who struck the blow that killed little
Smiley and the man who tortured him for all those months was found not
guilty of murder. He was found guilty of causing or allowing the death
of a child. What is the difference? The man should go away for life. ALL
three of the people involved should never be free again and should never
be able to be around children again.
Smiley's mother,
stepfather and Jason Owen were scheduled to be sentenced in this case,
on December 11, 2008. Disgustingly, each of them faces only a 14 year sentence
for the horrible things that were done to this child. Names of Smiley's
parents are being withheld due to another charge of abused involving another
child in the family. How disgusting is it that these two people get more
protection after what they did, than an innocent child was ever given in
his life?
At the end of November
2008, sentencing was postponed until March or April of 2009. What is the
hold up? Sentence them and get it over with. Let these monsters know that
what they did was horrible and make it count. Giving a child killer a 14
year sentence is not enough. ANYONE who kills a child through abuse,
should get and DESERVES to get, life in prison without parole.
Update:
I just today, March
1, 2009, became aware of the name of the people responsible for the death
of this Angel. His mother, Tracey Connelly, and his stepfather, Steven
Barker as well as Jason Owen are the ones who tortured and killed this
little boy.

On Christmas 2008,
about 100,000 people released blue balloons for Smiley. It does my heart
good to know that so many people care about this little Angel and that
he will be remembered.
..
...
There is grave marker
to memorialize this little boy. After his death, he was cremated and his
ashes were spread over St. Pancras cemetery in Einfled North London England.
There was as small memorial that was created by other people, for Peter.
I thank God for those people who may not even know these little Angels,
but they do all they can to keep their memory alive.

The black stone with
the teddy bear which gives Peter's date of birth and the date when he died,
is the headstone on his grave.
.
.
.

Peter's grave covered
in hundreds of toys and messages from people who cared about him and loved
him more than he had been cared for or loved by those who were supposed
to take care of him.

.
People were so outraged
as details of what happened to Peter come out that they were refusing to
pay what is known as council tax. What was being demanded was that Sharon
Shoesmith director of Haringey's Children and Young People's Service lose
her job as well as others who had failed to protect Peter from his abusers.
Stephanie Biber posted a message on the window of the Hornsey And Wood
Green Labour Party offices asking for Sharon to be sacked:
"This is the
final straw. I'm just so angry about it all. I've written to my bank asking
it not to
pay council
tax to Haringey Council"
More people felt
the same way and had done the same thing. A spokesman for the council said
that the police had been receiving many calls from angry residents:
"As you might
expect, views are being expressed by
local people."

I want to thank a very
special woman for sending me this story and for giving me updates and information
that I was not aware of. Kelly, thank you so much for calling to my attention,
the story of this little Angel. People like you make a world of difference
in a world so full of hatred and evil. Thanks for being a new friend "across
the pond" :)
Update:
Thank you to Lisa
for making me aware that the sentences had been handed down. People like
you help me to be able to give the most current information about these
children.
In May of 2009, the
sentences
(If you could call them that) for those responsible for
the death of Peter Connelly. Tracey Connelly, who was 27 years old at the
time, was given an indefinite sentence, however, she will be allowed to
apply for parole in three years due to time she has already served in prison.
In a letter she had written to the court in order to plead for leniency,
Tracy said:
“I have lost
all I hold dear to me. Now every day of my life
is full of
guilt... I am truly sorry”
Tracey begged her
family and Peter's biological father for forgiveness for what had happened
to Peter:
"I accept I
failed my son Peter for which I have pleaded guilty. By not being fully
open with social services I stopped them from being able to do a full job.
As a direct result of this, my son got
hurt and sadly
lost his short life"
Peter's biological
father said that he felt horrible about how Peter had suffered through
months of pain, fear and loneliness at the hands of these people, before
his death. He added that his life had become a living nightmare since he
had lost his son.
Steven barker, who
was 32 at that time and was found to have raped a two year old girl was
sentenced to only 12 years for Peter's death and was sentenced to life
for raping the two year old girl. There was a recommendation that he serve
at least ten years.
Jason Owen, who was
37 at that time, was also given an indefinite sentence, though he will
be allowed to apply for parole in two years.
Judge Stephen Kramer,
who was the judge who gave these ridiculous sentences, said they would
be held in prison until such time as they are no longer a risk to the public
or to children.
Stephen Kramer, said
the two given indefinite sentences would both be held until "deemed no
longer to be a risk to the public, in particular to small children", the
sentences were subject to widespread media criticism last weekend. The
mother's tariff of five years means that in practice she could be released
three years from now, because of the time she spent on remand awaiting
trial.
In court, Judge Stephen
Kramer admitted that Peter had died:
“In horrific
circumstances with injuries that can only have caused great pain
and distress
prior to his
death. Any decent person who heard the catalogue of medical conditions
and
non-accidental
injuries suffered by Peter cannot fail to have been appalled”
He also said to Tracey
that she was:
“Manipulative
and self-centred person, with a calculating side as well as a temper”,
who had
“actively
deceived” the authorities in order to protect her boyfriend"
This IDIOT Judge
said all of that and then imposed less than life in prison without the
possibility of parole? Who is he trying to fool? He obviously has no regard
for the life of Peter.
Jack Straw
defended the
use of these sentences saying that the tariff that had been
set was only the minimum sentence that would be served. He said that he
knew Lady Scotland, the attorney general, would ask the appeals court to
review the cases as she sees these sentences as being unduly lenient:
"We have
called for the papers in this case since the attorney general has the power
to
refer certain
sentences to the court of appeal for review if, after looking at all the
facts, she
thinks the
sentence was unduly lenient. Within this power, the attorney general can
look at
minimum tariffs
imposed on life and indeterminate sentence prisoners"
It was said that
the public needs to understand that these sentences do not mean that the
prisoners will be released for sure after their minimum sentences had been
served. Release of these prisoners would come when a parole board was satisfied
that they were no longer a threat to society.
Some children's charities
were extremely upset with the sentences. The National Society For The Prevention
Of Cruelty To Children said that these sentences were unacceptable since
they were so short:
"It raises
the question of how bad the abuse has to be before offenders get a longer
time in prison"
Chief Executive
- Andrew Flannagan
A petition was set
up and over night it already had 50,000 signatures of people who were demanding
longer sentences for Peter's killers. Tracey's own mother said she would
sign the petition:
“She may think
I’m a traitor but I will be signing your petition. My daughter is pure
evil.
I’ve lost
my grandson"
Some comments from
the public:
"There has
never been a better example of how out of touch our soft judges are"
Magish
"Judges, like
MPs have lost touch. I'd spend longer locked up if I fiddled my taxes"
Gus-gazzler
“This light
sentence does not reflect in any way the seriousness of this crime"
tillytuppence
“It certainly
does not take into account the unimaginable suffering of a little boy.”
"I’m
sickened. When will these lawmakers, judges, and politicians get a feel
for the mood in this country? Is that really the paltry price for a child’s
life”
Bert123456
“The problem
is people are no longer scared of the judicial system. These evil people
will live a comfortable life in prison and want for nothing"
Sweet-student
“The only appropriate
sentence would be life without the possibility of parole.”
“Britain
is lost in red tape”
AComment90
A mother, Sara Payne,
who lost her own eight year old daughter, Sarah, when she was murdered
in 2000 by a Pedophile named Roy Whiting commented:
“I am
sickened to learn of the pitiful tariffs handed down to the individuals
directly responsible f
or this baby’s
death. They are wicked, loathsome and unquestionably on a par with every
child
killer in
the country. These laughable prison terms have enraged the public. And
it’s an insult
to the all-too-short
life of a harmless 17-month-old. As a mother, I implore the relevant authorities
to reconsider
their decisions. This is all about justice for Baby P.”
On May 22, 2009,
a second review of the way this case was handled, determined that Peter's
death could and should have been prevented. It was found that doctors,
lawyers, police and social workers should have been able to stop this abuse
the very first time time Peter was seriously injured.
Though Peter had
been placed under child protective services due to concerns about his care,
his case was considered routine with the injuries being normal childhood
injuries. The director of Haringey Council of children's services and four
other of the employees there were fired from their jobs and two of the
doctors involved have been suspended.
Lord William Laming,
who was the head of a nationwide review of child protections services after
Peter's death said that he was very confident that a wide ranging reform
of the system to protect children would be introduced. He stated that Peter's
case had brought out shock and concern due to the failure of public services
to step in and
protect young children
who had already been shown to be at a serious risk:
“I am confident
that the recommendations I have made will be implemented fully and will
produce the
step change needed to improve children’s services across the whole of the
country”
Baby P prison
terms to be reviewed
May 27, 2009
Baroness Scotland
could refer the case to the Court of Appeal if she concludes the sentences
were "unduly lenient".
Children's charities
have condemned the jail terms given to the three people convicted of causing
or allowing the little boy's death.
Last week at the
Old Bailey Baby P's mother, 27, was given an indefinite sentence with a
minimum term of five years after pleading guilty to causing or allowing
her son's death.
Her boyfriend, 32,
was jailed for life with a minimum of 10 years for raping a two-year-old
girl. He was also given a 12-year term to run concurrently for his "major
role" in Peter's death.
The couple's lodger,
Jason Owen, 37, of Bromley, south east London, was jailed for a minimum
of three years.
A spokesman for the
Attorney General's office said she could appeal against the minimum terms
handed down.
He said: "We have
called for the papers in this case since the Attorney General has the power
to refer certain sentences to the Court of Appeal for review if, after
looking at all the facts, she thinks the sentence was unduly lenient.
"Within this power,
the Attorney General can look at minimum tariffs imposed on life and indeterminate
sentence prisoners.
"However, it is important
to understand that such prisoners are not released automatically after
the minimum term has been served - they are only released when the independent
Parole Board is satisfied that their continued detention is no longer necessary
to protect the public."
Read
News Related To Peter's Death
See
Pictures And Read About Peter's Memorial
Return
To Peter's Story
For information about preventing child abuse in England
click below. If they can't help you, ask for someone who can. NEVER
give up looking for help for an abused child!
Call this number
to report child abuse ANY WHERE in the United States!
1-800-4-A-Child
1-800-422-4453

  
Share this page
with your family and friends!
My sincerest appreciation goes out to
Diane Trembly for allowing me to use one
of her beautiful Angels to make the graphics
for this set. Please visit her site,
by clicking the link below, to see all
of her amazing work.
|